<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>The Corpus Callosum</title>
      <link>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/</link>
      <description>The Corpus Callosum is an occasional journal of armchair musings, by a suburban, reality-based, slightly-left-of-center guy, who reserves the right to be highly irregular at times. Topics: social commentary, neuroscience, politics, science news. Mission: to develop connections between hard science and social science, using linear thinking and intuition; and to explore the relative merits of spontaneity vs. strategy.</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 01:35:36 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/scienceblogs/vjmG" /><feedburner:info uri="scienceblogs/vjmg" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>scienceblogs/vjmG</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
         <title>New Role for Karrikins</title>
          <description>This is a nice little study in PNAS.&amp;nbsp; It is nice for a few
reasons.&amp;nbsp; For one, it is the sort of thing that drives
conservatives crazy, for it seems to be a highly detailed study of
something useless.&amp;nbsp; Two, it could turn out to be pretty
useful.&amp;nbsp; Three, when I searched ScienceBlogs for "karrikin," I got
zero hits.&amp;nbsp; Fourth, when I search Wikipedia for "karrikin," I got
zero hits.&amp;nbsp; So it is about time someone started talking about
these chemicals.&amp;nbsp; Plus, "karrikin" is a cool word.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"Karrikin" is the &lt;a
href="http://www.news.uwa.edu.au/20090219889/biomedical-biomolecular-and-chemical-sciences/a-noongar-word-smoke-finds-a-place-scien"&gt;Noongan
word for "smoke."&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp; Karrikins comprise a class of chemicals
found in smoke from burning plant matter.&amp;nbsp; It has been known for a
long time that smoke from brush fires can stimulate the germination of
some kinds of seeds.&amp;nbsp; In fact, persons who are trying to germinate
difficult-to-start seeds, will sometimes use &lt;a
href="http://www.seedman.com/cape.htm"&gt;products&lt;/a&gt; derived from
smoke, in an effort to get the seeds to germinate.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/content/full/149/2/863"&gt;&lt;img
alt="karrikins.gif"
src="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/04/05/karrikins.gif"
class="mt-image-center"
style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;"
border="0" height="356" width="440"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"&gt;
&lt;i&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.plantphysiol.org/cgi/content/full/149/2/863"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Figure
1&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;Partial structural similarity between
the&amp;nbsp;karrikin&amp;nbsp;family of plant growth regulators and
strigolactones. &lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Researchers in Australia have been studying this for a few years, at
least:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a
href="http://www.seedquest.com/News/releases/2007/june/19657.htm"&gt;Ground-breaking
research into the link between seed growth and smoke&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dr Nelson, a researcher at the Australian Research Council (ARC) Centre
of Excellence in Plant Energy Biology, at The University of Western
Australia, is investigating how it is that some plant seeds are
triggered to germinate after exposure to smoke...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Dr Nelson said fires played a major role in shaping the Australian bush.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"Even though the landscape looks devastated to us after a bushfire, it
is quickly covered by a flush of new growth," he said.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"For the seeds of many native Australian species, the smoke from a fire
is the trigger to wake up and take advantage of the newly available
resources. Understanding this phenomenon could have major impacts on
conservation efforts and agriculture."&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Although smoke is a complex mixture of thousands of different
compounds, recent work at UWA and Perth's Kings Park laboratories was
able to identify a single 'smoke alarm' component that snaps seeds out
of dormancy...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, it turns out that karrikins have an additional role:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/04/new_role_for_karrikins.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/04/new_role_for_karrikins.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/hiejgO3fpXg" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/04/new_role_for_karrikins.php</guid>
         <category>Science News</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 05 Apr 2010 01:35:36 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/04/new_role_for_karrikins.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Happy Easter</title>
          <description>Well, it is not the traditional flower, but it happens to be what is
blooming right now.&amp;nbsp; The crocuses and daffodils are pretty much
spent;
the lilies and allium haven't blossomed yet.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/jyaroch/4491077180/"
title="IMG_2414.JPG by Joseph j7uy5, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img
src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4048/4491077180_73260f0c80.jpg"
alt="IMG_2414.JPG" height="375" width="500"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
These are blossoms on a claretcup cactus (&lt;i&gt;Echinocereus
triglochidiatus&lt;/i&gt;).&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/04/happy_easter.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/OTGbIKUrY8E" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/04/happy_easter.php</guid>
         <category>Photos of Interest</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 04 Apr 2010 17:48:54 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/04/happy_easter.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>In Which Hannity Demonstrates Nothing</title>
          <description>I guess Fox News is starting a series of vignettes, hoping to show that
stimulus money is being wasted.&amp;nbsp; In an early attempt, Hannity and
Carlson track
down an entomologist, at Michigan State University, who got a $200,000
grant from stimulus funds.&amp;nbsp; The scientist is &lt;a
href="http://www.ent.msu.edu/Directory/Facultypages/Cognato/tabid/135/Default.aspx"&gt;Dr.
Anthony Cognato&lt;/a&gt;, Associate Professor in the Department of
Entomology.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;object height="315" width="500"&gt;&lt;param name="movie"
value="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/m7f52y4Nq4E&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;color1=0x234900&amp;amp;color2=0x4e9e00&amp;amp;border=1"&gt;&lt;param
name="allowFullScreen" value="true"&gt;&lt;param name="allowscriptaccess"
value="always"&gt;
&lt;embed
src="http://www.youtube-nocookie.com/v/m7f52y4Nq4E&amp;amp;hl=en_US&amp;amp;fs=1&amp;amp;rel=0&amp;amp;color1=0x234900&amp;amp;color2=0x4e9e00&amp;amp;border=1"
type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always"
allowfullscreen="true" height="315" width="500"&gt;&lt;/object&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I will let the viewers judge for themselves if the Fox crew managed to
demonstrate anything at all.&amp;nbsp; One thing that is clear: they do not
understand basic science, or anything about science.&amp;nbsp; They also
fail to appreciate how foolish it is to confront experts, without
having done some serious preparation.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If you are trying to make a point, you should not ask questions to
experts, unless you have a pretty good idea of what they are going to
say.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It this video, it appears as though they expected to find that the
grant did not produce any jobs.&amp;nbsp; But it did produce jobs: four
students for two years, at 8-10 dollars per hour, plus the
manufacturing jobs for those who made the supplies.&amp;nbsp; They expected
to find that the project has no value, but it does have value.&amp;nbsp;
Scientists need data, and for entomologists, some of that data comes
from collections.&amp;nbsp; At an agricultural university, the study of
insects happens to be rather important.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
While there is no guarantee that this particular collection will lead
to important discoveries, that is always the case with basic
research.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
They may be skeptical of the value of basic science.&amp;nbsp; Indeed,
there are valid arguments to be made about how much funding should go
to pure vs. applied research.&amp;nbsp; However, they did not address that
at all.&amp;nbsp; They merely dismissed it out of hand, with no attempt at
analysis.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The only value in a vignette such as this, is if you are attempting to
incite the passions of those who already have a particular belief, and
who are susceptible to &lt;a
href="http://www.sciencedaily.com/articles/c/confirmation_bias.htm"&gt;confirmation
bias&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp; Such persons see evidence that appears to confirm what
they already believe, so they do not examine the evidence (or the
issue) any further.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/in_which_hannity_demonstrates.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/ZzNsnmd7LPo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/in_which_hannity_demonstrates.php</guid>
         <category>Science in the Media</category>
         
         <pubDate>Fri, 26 Mar 2010 08:58:26 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/in_which_hannity_demonstrates.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Ghost Chile Update #2</title>
          <description>I've &lt;a
href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2007/08/it_wont_be_the_bhut_of_many_jo.php"&gt;written&lt;/a&gt;
&lt;a
href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2007/08/bhut_jolokia_update.php"&gt;before&lt;/a&gt;
about the world's hotter chle pepper: the bhut jolokia, rated at over 1
million scoville units. (&lt;a
href="http://www.chilepepperinstitute.org/holy_jolokia.php"&gt;Sauce
available here&lt;/a&gt;.)&amp;nbsp; Now, India has a new use for the infernal
things: combatting terrorism.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;big&gt;&lt;a
href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/mar/23/india-chilli-bhut-jolokia-terrorism"&gt;India
deploys world's hottest chilli to fight terrorism&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/big&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;b&gt;Bhut jolokia, or 'ghost chilli', to be used for teargas-like
grenades to immobilise suspects, defence officials say&lt;/b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;p
style="margin: 0px 0px 13px; padding: 0px; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: arial,sans-serif;"&gt;Ever
since the Trojan Horse - and probably long before - men have bent their
minds to developing the ultimate secret weapon. Now, at last, the
Indian army just might have discovered it: the world's hottest chilli
pepper.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p
style="margin: 0px 0px 13px; padding: 0px; border-collapse: collapse; font-family: arial,sans-serif;"&gt;The
Indian army believes that the pungency of its ground seeds of the bhut
jolokia - a capsicum hybrid, growing around the banks of the
Brahmaputra river, that is reputed to be 100 times hotter than a
jalapeño - could be harnessed in smoke grenades against rioters or to
flush out terrorists in confined spaces...&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html; charset=utf-8"&gt;
These peppers are two orders of magnitude hotter than the
&amp;nbsp;jalapeño.&amp;nbsp; Mother nature always wins, in the end.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/ghost_chile_update_2.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/N0O0_qmlzbU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/ghost_chile_update_2.php</guid>
         <category>Chatter</category>
         
         <pubDate>Tue, 23 Mar 2010 23:55:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/ghost_chile_update_2.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>WSJ: Incompetent Ranting</title>
          <description>At first, I was going to title this post WSJ: Incompetent Ranting. Then
I decided that was too strong.&amp;nbsp; Then I read the article again, and
went back to the original title.&amp;nbsp; Mind you, this is not intended
to be an ad hominem attack.&amp;nbsp; The author, &lt;a
href="http://www.chass.utoronto.ca/history/faculty/facultyprofiles/shorter.html"&gt;Edward
Shorter&lt;/a&gt;,
has been the Hannah Professor in the History of Medicine since 1991,
and in 1996 was cross-appointed as Professor of Psychiatry (at the
University of Toronto).&amp;nbsp; He has written some good books, including
&lt;i&gt;A History of Psychiatry: From the Era of the Asylum to the Age of
Prozac&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp; The book was &lt;a
href="http://psychservices.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/full/49/9/1241"&gt;reviewed
favorably&lt;/a&gt; in an APA journal.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The WSJ article is so fraught with problems, that I thought it must
have
been written by a Scientologist, or someone like that.&amp;nbsp; No, Dr.
Shorter is a serious academician.&amp;nbsp; Perhaps his perspective has
been
distorted by some unstated agenda.&amp;nbsp; I don't know.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
(Note: the WSJ has a dorky semi-permeable paywall, so the link below
might not work.&amp;nbsp; If it does not, perhaps the &lt;a
href="http://74.125.95.132/search?q=cache:1XLrEucYxaEJ:online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704188104575083700227601116.html+Psychopharmacology,+or+the+treatment+of+the+mind+and+brain+with+drugs,+has+come+to+dominate+the+field.&amp;amp;cd=2&amp;amp;hl=en&amp;amp;ct=clnk&amp;amp;gl=us&amp;amp;client=firefox-a"&gt;Google
cache version&lt;/a&gt; will, or &lt;a
href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=t&amp;amp;source=web&amp;amp;ct=res&amp;amp;cd=2&amp;amp;ved=0CAoQFjAB&amp;amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fonline.wsj.com%2Farticle%2FSB10001424052748704188104575083700227601116.html&amp;amp;ei=nwSLS5WILY6INpSxpd4H&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHqIV4pNU9Trx6fZ0aoC0Ht0UmVYw&amp;amp;sig2=OHZaB3vIwRqQfg66uUnWNw"&gt;a
link&lt;/a&gt; taken from a Google search.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a
href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748704188104575083700227601116.html#articleTabs%3Dcomments"&gt;Why
Psychiatry Needs Therapy&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
A manual's draft reflects how diagnoses have grown foggier, drugs more
ineffective&lt;br&gt;
By EDWARD SHORTER&lt;br&gt;
LIFE &amp;amp; STYLE&lt;br&gt;
FEBRUARY 27, 2010&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To flip through the latest draft of the American Psychiatric
Association's Diagnostic and Statistical Manual, in the works for seven
years now, is to see the discipline's floundering writ large.
Psychiatry seems to have lost its way in a forest of poorly verified
diagnoses and ineffectual medications. Patients who seek psychiatric
help today for mood disorders stand a good chance of being diagnosed
with a disease that doesn't exist and treated with a medication little
more effective than a placebo...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/wsj_incompetent_ranting.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/wsj_incompetent_ranting.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/hd8ywF4dwtE" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/wsj_incompetent_ranting.php</guid>
         <category>Psychiatry</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 15 Mar 2010 08:27:12 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/wsj_incompetent_ranting.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Yeah, We're Calling Obama Socialist</title>
          <description>A few days ago, there was a minor ripple in the political world, when a
media person tried to get John McCain to say that Obama is a
socialist.&amp;nbsp; Even though McCain had hinted at that several times
during the campaign, he would never state directly that Obama is a
socialist.&amp;nbsp; Well, &lt;a
href="http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,587772,00.html"&gt;he still
won't&lt;/a&gt; (as reported by Fox):&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;DAVID GREGORY, HOST, "MEET THE PRESS": Do you think that
goes too far? Is it a socialist agenda from the president?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
SEN. JOHN MCCAIN, R-ARIZ.: There is no doubt in my mind America's a
right-of-center nation, and this administration is governing from the
left. That's why the president's approval ratings continue to decline.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
GREGORY: But my question was, do you think that kind of -- because have
you heard that description before. Not just from J.D. Hayworth, but
others. Does it go too far to say the president's agenda is a socialist
agenda?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
MCCAIN: I think I gave my description. I think they're governing from
the left on a broad variety of issues, but I'll let others speak for
themselves. I have enough time taking care of my own misstatements.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
McCain is someone I try to like, although I did not vote for him. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Now, the issue is picking up steam, without McCain on board:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a
href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=124359632&amp;amp;ft=1&amp;amp;f=1001"&gt;Top
Republicans: Yeah, We're Calling Obama Socialist&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
by Liz Halloran&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span class="date"&gt;March 5, 2010&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/yeah_were_calling_obama_social.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/yeah_were_calling_obama_social.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/_8odpdSrPrc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/yeah_were_calling_obama_social.php</guid>
         <category>Politics</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 09:18:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/yeah_were_calling_obama_social.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Early Spring</title>
          <description>We had little squall clouds today, such that there was interesting
light and shadow in the yard.&amp;nbsp; This made for a nice opportunity to
photograph the nectarine tree blossoms.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a
href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/assets_c/2010/03/nectarine_tree_blossom-42244.php"
onclick="window.open('http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/assets_c/2010/03/nectarine_tree_blossom-42244.php','popup','width=1024,height=768,scrollbars=no,resizable=no,toolbar=no,directories=no,location=no,menubar=no,status=no,left=0,top=0'); return false"&gt;&lt;img
src="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/assets_c/2010/03/nectarine_tree_blossom-thumb-500x375-42244.jpg"
alt="nectarine_tree_blossom.jpg" class="mt-image-center"
style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;"
height="375" width="500"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Emotionally uplifting, I would say.&amp;nbsp; The only problem is that we
now have to watch for frost warnings, then run out and cover the tree
if it might freeze.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/early_spring.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/eLfoHY25Mlw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/early_spring.php</guid>
         <category>Photos of Interest</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 07 Mar 2010 19:31:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/early_spring.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Dietary Practices, Depression and Anxiety</title>
          <description>The January 2010 &lt;i&gt;American Journal of Psychiatry&lt;/i&gt; has two
articles pertaining to the relationship between dietary practices and
mental health.&amp;nbsp; One article presents the results of a study; the
other is an editorial.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a
href="http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/cgi/content/abstract/ajp;167/3/305"&gt;Association
of Western and Traditional Diets With Depression and Anxiety in Women &lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Jacka &lt;i&gt;et al.&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Am J Psychiatry 2010; 167:305-311 (published online January 4, 2010;
doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09060881) © 2010 American Psychiatric
Association&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/dietary_practices_depression_a.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/dietary_practices_depression_a.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/-1_91wWu4h0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/dietary_practices_depression_a.php</guid>
         <category>Psychiatry</category>
         
         <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 07:22:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/03/dietary_practices_depression_a.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Evolution Messed Up?</title>
          <description>James Gunn, the director for the movie &lt;a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slither_%282006_film%29"&gt;&lt;i&gt;Slither&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/a&gt;,
seems to be enthralled by creepy crawly things.&amp;nbsp; He also has a
blog-like website, on which he posted &lt;i&gt;&lt;a
href="http://www.jamesgunn.com/2009/07/02/evolution-fucked-your-shit-up-the-worlds-50-freakiest-animals/"&gt;Evolution
Fucked Your Shit Up: The World's 50 Freakiest Animals&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/i&gt;. (HT: &lt;a
href="http://charlierb3.blogspot.com/2010/02/friday-lists_19.html"&gt;Interesting
Pile&lt;/a&gt;.)&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img alt="Ajolote.jpg"
src="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/21/Ajolote.jpg"
class="mt-image-center"
style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;"
height="308" width="400"&gt;The creature pictured above, by the way, is
an ajolote.&amp;nbsp; The term &lt;i&gt;ajolote&lt;/i&gt; can refer to either the &lt;a
href="http://scienceblogs.com/tetrapodzoology/2008/02/axolotls_on_the_edge.php"
title="Axolotl"&gt;Axolotl&lt;/a&gt; an (aquatic salamander (genus &lt;i&gt;Ambystoma&lt;/i&gt;),
or it can refer to the &lt;a
href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mexican_mole_lizard"&gt;Mexican mole
lizard&lt;/a&gt; (&lt;i&gt;Bipes biporus&lt;/i&gt;).&amp;nbsp; The one in the picture is the
lizard, &lt;i&gt;Bipes biporus&lt;/i&gt;.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I am not going to say any more about the vexations of taxonomy, or even
about Mr. Gunn.&amp;nbsp; The photos are kind of neat, but they speak for
themselves.&amp;nbsp; What I am going to address is the notion that
evolution messed these creatures up.&amp;nbsp; I suspect that Mr. Gunn was
not intending to make a scientifically verifiable statement.&amp;nbsp; But
it is way off base, and it illustrates a fundamental misconception
about evolution.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/evolution_messed_up.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/evolution_messed_up.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/8wxzU7mPCi4" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/evolution_messed_up.php</guid>
         <category>Armchair Musings</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 21 Feb 2010 21:03:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/evolution_messed_up.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Zen and the Art of Dracaena Growing</title>
          <description>Sometimes I see sad-looking plants on clearance, buy them, and try to
heal them.&amp;nbsp; This activity provides me with a gratification that is
similar to that which comes from healing sad-looking people, but
without the tribulations that occur if it does not work as well as we
had hoped.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I even have some of these plants in my office (although none of the
worse cases go there).&amp;nbsp; At stressful times, I may go and look at
the parts of the plants that are growing well: apical meristems, leaf
primodia, and axillary buds -- or green shoots, in the vernacular of
our time.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; I just look at them.&amp;nbsp; I don't actually &lt;i&gt;do&lt;/i&gt;
anything, at least anything that is outwardly visible, most of the
time.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;img alt="Dracaena-closeup.jpeg"
src="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/13/Dracaena-closeup.jpeg"
class="mt-image-center"
style="margin: 0pt auto 20px; text-align: center; display: block;"
height="374" width="500"&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/zen_and_the_art_of_dracaena_gr.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/zen_and_the_art_of_dracaena_gr.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/J4YkYSCRfsU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/zen_and_the_art_of_dracaena_gr.php</guid>
         <category>Armchair Musings</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 14 Feb 2010 07:54:43 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/zen_and_the_art_of_dracaena_gr.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Proposed Diagnostic Criteria Revisions</title>
          <description>The American Psychiatric Association has &lt;a
href="http://www.dsm5.org/Pages/Default.aspx"&gt;gone public&lt;/a&gt; with the
details
of their proposed revisions to their &lt;i&gt;Diagnostic and Statistical
Manual&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp; As expected, most of this is bland and not worthy of
attention from the general public.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Unfortunately, as &lt;a
href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/02/10/health/10psych.html?hp"&gt;Benedict
Carey points out&lt;/a&gt;, the book often is used for purposes other than
those for which it is intended, which can lead to unintended
consequences.&amp;nbsp; It remains to be seen what these will be.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
I'm just going to make some quick, admittedly superficial
comments.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
First, I wince at the new category for autism: &lt;a
href="http://www.dsm5.org/ProposedRevisions/Pages/proposedrevision.aspx?rid=94"&gt;Autism
Spectrum Disorder&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/proposed_diagnostic_criteria_r.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/proposed_diagnostic_criteria_r.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/RCx84M78sAU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/proposed_diagnostic_criteria_r.php</guid>
         <category>Psychiatry</category>
         
         <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:46:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/proposed_diagnostic_criteria_r.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Objective Diagnosis Of PTSD Using Magnetoencephalography</title>
          <description>&lt;span style="padding: 5px; float: left;"&gt;&lt;a
href="http://www.researchblogging.org"&gt;&lt;img alt="ResearchBlogging.org"
src="http://www.researchblogging.org/public/citation_icons/rb2_large_gray.png"
style="border: 0pt none ;"&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;Objective diagnosis is in some
ways the holy grail of medicine.&amp;nbsp; It has been maddeningly elusive
in psychiatry.&amp;nbsp; Now comes a paper in which the authors suggest
that they may have found this treasure.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The paper details a method of using magnetoencephalography to assess
human brain function.&amp;nbsp; They claim that, in a select population, it
can correctly identify patients with PTSD with 90% accuracy.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a
href="http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1741-2552/7/1/016011/"&gt;The
synchronous neural interactions test as a functional neuromarker for
post-traumatic&amp;nbsp; stress disorder (PTSD): a robust classification
method based on the bootstrap&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span class="cite"&gt;&lt;span class="cite_authors"&gt;A P Georgopoulos &lt;i&gt;et
al&lt;/i&gt;&lt;/span&gt; 2010 &lt;i class="cite_journal_full"&gt;J. Neural Eng.&lt;/i&gt; &lt;strong
class="cite_volume"&gt;7&lt;/strong&gt; 016011&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span class="cite"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span class="cite"&gt;&lt;b&gt;Abstract.&lt;/b&gt; Traumatic experiences can produce
post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) which is a debilitating condition
and for which no biomarker currently exists (Institute of Medicine (US)
2006 Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: Diagnosis and Assessment
(Washington, DC: National Academies)). Here we show that the
synchronous neural interactions (SNI) test which assesses the
functional interactions among neural populations derived from
magnetoencephalographic (MEG) recordings (Georgopoulos A P et al 2007
J. Neural Eng. 4 349-55) can successfully differentiate PTSD patients
from healthy control subjects. Externally cross-validated,
bootstrap-based analyses yielded &amp;gt;90% overall accuracy of
classification. In addition, all but one of 18 patients who were not
receiving medications for their disease were correctly classified.
Altogether, these findings document robust differences in brain
function between the PTSD and control groups that can be used for
differential diagnosis and which possess the potential for assessing
and monitoring disease progression and effects of therapy.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;span class="cite"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The synchronous neural interactions test is a test that is done by
having persons perform a simple task, while the magnetic signals from
their brain are being measured.&amp;nbsp; The process is called &lt;a
href="http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Magnetoencephalogram"&gt;magnetoencephalography&lt;/a&gt;.&amp;nbsp;
The resulting record is called a magnetoencephalogram (MEG).&amp;nbsp; It
is similar to an electroencephalogram (EEG).&amp;nbsp; The difference is
that the EEG measures small electric currents.&amp;nbsp; The MEG measures
magnetic impulses.&amp;nbsp; These impulses are only slightly affected by
the intervening tissue (skull, skin, etc).&amp;nbsp; Therefore, it is
possible to get readings that are more precise.&amp;nbsp; The downside is
that it requires a more elaborate device, and a special,
magnetically-shielded, room.&amp;nbsp; Very few of these devices exist.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/objective_diagnosis_of_ptsd_us.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/objective_diagnosis_of_ptsd_us.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/BoB15s4b8yQ" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/objective_diagnosis_of_ptsd_us.php</guid>
         <category>Neuroscience</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 09:08:41 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/02/objective_diagnosis_of_ptsd_us.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Google Chrome on Opensuse 11.2</title>
          <description>I decided to try using Google Chrome as a web browser.  The reason is that it is supposed to be faster, particularly for sites that make heavy use of Flash.  It turns out that installing it is a hassle if you do it the obvious way, because Flash does not work without fiddling around.  That sort of defeats the purpose. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The easier way is to use the one-click install at:&lt;br&gt;
&lt;a href="http://software.opensuse.org/ymp/openSUSE:Factory:Contrib/openSUSE_11.2/chromium.ymp"&gt;http://software.opensuse.org/ymp/ope...2/chromium.ymp&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This adds the necessary repositories, downloads the application, and configures it so that flash works right away.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
It seems to work pretty well.  It remains to be seen, however, if Chrome has any chance of becoming my main browser.  After all, the first browser I used was &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mosaic_(web_browser)"&gt;NCSA Mosaic&lt;/a&gt;, which morphed into Netscape Navigator, which went through several iterations, then became the basis for Firefox.  I just followed along.  After 17 years, it might be hard to change.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/google_chrome_on_opensuse_112.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/tdELvXwT8qA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/google_chrome_on_opensuse_112.php</guid>
         <category>Computing</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 07:31:27 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/google_chrome_on_opensuse_112.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Glaxo Patent Giveaway: Charity or "Theft"?</title>
          <description>I saw this headline on Google Fast Flip, and had to read it.&amp;nbsp; I'm
always game for an anti-big-pharma story: even though I appreciate
their efforts to relieve suffering, I do like to take notice of their
shadier practices. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;a
href="http://business.theatlantic.com/2010/01/is_glaxos_charity_really_theft.php"&gt;Is
Glaxo's Charity Really Theft?&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
Jan 20 2010, 5:30 pm &lt;br&gt;
by Daniel Indiviglio&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Is there a fine line? Corporations have a duty to shareholders to
maximize profits. But when they donate to charity -- which is regularly
done these days, often through foundations -- this takes money out of
shareholders' hands or stifles future growth. It instead provides that
money to some cause that management deems appropriate. But &lt;b&gt;Glaxo-SmithKline's
recent decision to put thousands of chemical compounds which may cure
malaria into the public domain gives this question a new dimension&lt;/b&gt;,
adding additional complexity...&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The story does not go where I expected.&amp;nbsp; It is not talking about
some kind of charity scam, in which they get PR karma for doing
something that really only benefits themselves.&amp;nbsp; Rather, the story
is about the fact that Glaxo is releasing some of the compounds it has
developed, into the public domain. &lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Indiviglio's story is posted on the &lt;i&gt;Atlantic&lt;/i&gt; business
blog.&amp;nbsp; It is based upon an article in the (UK) &lt;i&gt;Guardian&lt;/i&gt;.&amp;nbsp;
The &lt;i&gt;Guardian&lt;/i&gt; version is reasonably thoughtful, whereas the &lt;i&gt;Atlantic&lt;/i&gt;
version is frankly offensive.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/glaxo_patent_giveaway_charity.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/glaxo_patent_giveaway_charity.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/8TTKHshMWYA" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/glaxo_patent_giveaway_charity.php</guid>
         <category>Social Issues</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 08:23:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/glaxo_patent_giveaway_charity.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Why should the city be a concrete desert?</title>
          <description>Susanne Sternthal, a writer based in Moscow, has published an article
about the ecology of stray dogs.&amp;nbsp; The article is in &lt;i&gt;Financial
Times&lt;/i&gt;, of all places.&amp;nbsp; Why is that?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;big&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/big&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;big&gt;&lt;b&gt;&lt;a
href="http://www.ft.com/cms/s/2/628a8500-ff1c-11de-a677-00144feab49a.html"&gt;Moscow's
stray dogs&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/b&gt;&lt;/big&gt;&lt;br&gt;
By Susanne Sternthal&lt;br&gt;
January 16 2010 00:04&lt;br&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;br&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/why_should_the_city_be_a_concr.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/why_should_the_city_be_a_concr.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/vjmG/~4/_zoN9QwbQ3k" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/why_should_the_city_be_a_concr.php</guid>
         <category>Armchair Musings</category>
         
         <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 09:17:02 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/corpuscallosum/2010/01/why_should_the_city_be_a_concr.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>