<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" media="screen" href="/~d/styles/rss2full.xsl"?><?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" media="screen" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~d/styles/itemcontent.css"?><rss xmlns:feedburner="http://rssnamespace.org/feedburner/ext/1.0" version="2.0">
   <channel>
      <title>Stoat</title>
      <link>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/</link>
      <description>Taking science by the throat...</description>
      <language>en</language>
      <copyright>Copyright 2010</copyright>
      <lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 07:18:39 -0500</lastBuildDate>
      <generator>http://www.sixapart.com/movabletype/?v=4.32-en</generator>
      <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs> 

      
      <atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" href="http://feeds.feedburner.com/scienceblogs/stoat" /><feedburner:info uri="scienceblogs/stoat" /><atom10:link xmlns:atom10="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" rel="hub" href="http://pubsubhubbub.appspot.com/" /><feedburner:emailServiceId>scienceblogs/stoat</feedburner:emailServiceId><feedburner:feedburnerHostname>http://feedburner.google.com</feedburner:feedburnerHostname><item>
         <title>Eric Fnorrd and his Ouija Board?</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sepp.org/"&gt;SEPP&lt;/a&gt; has alwys been a one-man-band, that one man being &lt;a href="http://www.sourcewatch.org/index.php?title=S._Fred_Singer"&gt;Fred Singer&lt;/a&gt; of course (Do you know the dirt about Singer? &lt;a hreef="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2007/06/digging_up_the_dirt_on_singer.php"&gt;He was once sane&lt;/a&gt;. BTW, if you're here from wiki, don't miss &lt;a href="http://mustelid.blogspot.com/2005/11/sht-frm-lindzen.html"&gt;a post I did on Lindzen&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But being a one-man-band makes it look like you're a wacko (err...) so obviously you need an organisation, and obviously that organisation needs a board of directors, science advisors, you know the kind of thing: pad it out with some names to look impressive. So Singer did, the SEPP website proudly proclaims:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The following serve on the Board of Directors of The Science &amp; Environmental Policy Project:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;* Frederick Seitz, Ph.D. (Chairman)&lt;br /&gt;
* (etc)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;(see &lt;a href="http://sepp.org/about%20sepp/boarddir.html"&gt;http://sepp.org/about%20sepp/boarddir.html&lt;/a&gt;. Note to SEPP: I've saved a copy, and so has the internet archive, so don't bother trying to change it and pretend there was no problem).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;There is only one problem with this (well, other than that Seitz was also a bit of a wacko on GW, but let's skip over that): Seitz is pushing up the daisies. It must be true &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Frederick_Seitz"&gt;wikipedia says so&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;And: The following individuals serve on the Board of Science Advisors of The Science &amp; Environmental Policy Project:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;* Bruce N. Ames&lt;br /&gt;
* C.J.F. Böttcher&lt;br /&gt;
* Tor Ragnar Gerholm&lt;br /&gt;
* Michael J. Higatsberger&lt;br /&gt;
* Henry R. Linden&lt;br /&gt;
* Sir William Mitchell&lt;br /&gt;
* William A. Nierenberg&lt;br /&gt;
* Michel Salomon&lt;br /&gt;
* Chauncey Starr&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Again: nice people, kind to children and animals, a bit loopy perhaps, but suffering from a major problem: most of them are six feet under (fun game for a wet half-hour: work out which few of them *aren't* stiffs).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:William_M._Connolley&amp;diff=364091127&amp;oldid=364074856"&gt;it was suggested that they might be contactable via Ouija Board&lt;/a&gt;, so I'm wondering if any of the more cartoon-ly talented would care to try their hands at a &lt;a href="http://www.viz.co.uk/"&gt;Viz&lt;/a&gt; style strip. Unfortunately "Singer" doesn't rhyme with "board" and that is an absolute requirement. You'll never get close to the heights of &lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mickey%27s_Monkey_Spunk_Moped"&gt;Mickey's monkey spunk moped&lt;/a&gt; but it might be fun anyway. Alas I can't find a reprint of that cartoon on the web anymore.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Current best version is "Septic Fred, he talks to the Dead" slightly modified from the comments]&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/eric_fnorrd_and_his_ouija_boar.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/LOM6qqwvG-0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/LOM6qqwvG-0/eric_fnorrd_and_his_ouija_boar.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/eric_fnorrd_and_his_ouija_boar.php</guid>
         <category>climate people</category>
         
         <pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 07:18:39 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/eric_fnorrd_and_his_ouija_boar.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Champs Head</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/4633536348/" title="DSC_4609-champs-head by wmconnolley, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3356/4633536348_74336ae6bb.jpg" width="200" height="300" alt="DSC_4609-champs-head" align=left  /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Sunday was the &lt;a href="http://www.championrowing.org.uk/ChampsRaces/EightsHead/tabid/482/Default.aspx"&gt;Champs Head&lt;/a&gt;. It is a slightly odd head race: a short course (1200m, from the Plough to the Pike and Eel) from a standing start, but the start is just for fun, since you get timed from a few strokes in. It was a blazing day, it felt like the heights of midsummer not late spring, lovely to be out on the river.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I rowed for our M1 in the first division at 12, which was a fair enough race. James Tidy won the not-quite-too-far-over-the-top total coxing arrogance prize by overtaking everyone dawdling about by the railings. This raised a few eyebrows (this is England, don't y'know, not Italy) but actually there is no real point to the queues there. And anyway, everyone needs to get to the top and spin anyway. We said Hello to Elspeth who was marshalling in the shade by Chesterton bridge, very nice for her. As for the race: well. We were 39th with 5:16 (winning: Downing M1 with 4:33; a very cool result :-). And the Hornets beat us. Opinions amongst the crew were somewhat divided: some thought it was a good row, and in some ways I agree: we were balanced, and together. We weren't as strong as we could have been; not enough oomph, some holding back perhaps. But more than that, I thought we lacked a certain degree of class; things were just a bit blurred when they should have been sharp. And perhaps a couple of pips on the rating might have been good? We were very comfortable at 30, but perhaps too comfortable.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;A post race pint in the fort for analysis and digressions, siting by the river watching the boats go by: very pleasant. Leading on to division 3 at 3 o'clock.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Our second men's boat was a bit short of manliness in some respects, as my picture shows. I was coxing, because I enjoy it. After a while I worked out how to plug the speakers in, and could stop shouting, which was a relief to all. I remember the good old days when I started: only M1 had a cox box, these things were luxuries (did I tell you I grew up in a cardboard box in the middle of the road?) Due to injuries, and stuff, we ended up with four guest ladies, and by chance they were all strokeside, leading to what might have been a rather unbalanced boat, but wasn't. In fact it was better than I'd thought it would be, but ultimately underpowered and suffering from never having rowed together before. But never mind, we rowed a good race and they were kind enough to be kind to my coxing (having to drag around a cox heavier than all but a few of the crew didn't help, of course). In my pic: Laura (stroke), Dave R, Ev, Tony M (look at that grin), Emma B, Dave B, Lorraine, Simon (bow). Even if you can't see the front few. At this point, we've spun under the motorway bridge and are heading back down towards our marshalling station. Our time was 6:30, irritatingly 6 seconds slower than our W1, but they have been rowing together for a while and would probably have been rather p*ss*d off if we'd beaten them, so perhaps it is for the best.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;After which it was back home to cut the grass, plant the sweet peas (I know, I'm late) water the veg, weed the beds (nowhere near finished) drag away the cut-down trees, have dinner, finish the bow-and-arrow holder, stop the cat bringin live voles into the house (I never knew there was so much wildlife in the garden until the cat started killing it), and all the normal stuff of a sunday afternoon shading into evening.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Update:&lt;br /&gt;
 &lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a href="http://champshead2010.fotopic.net/p65012627.html"&gt;M1 near the start&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a href="http://champshead2010.fotopic.net/p65016777.html"&gt;"M"2 just on the finish line&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;from &lt;a href="http://champshead2010.fotopic.net/"&gt;DBP photographic&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Also, &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9BXxL9gztO8"&gt;the hydrofoil scull video&lt;/a&gt; is worth a look, as is the &lt;A href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uO54ZvDwt18&amp;feature=related"&gt;hydrofoil kayak&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/champs_head.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/STiicUFfprc" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/STiicUFfprc/champs_head.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/champs_head.php</guid>
         <category>rowing</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 18:24:25 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/champs_head.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Three views of sea ice</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;The troops are getting restive. What wil happen to this year's sea ice? &lt;a href="http://www.scientificblogging.com/chatter_box/arctic_ice_may_2010"&gt;Rumours abound&lt;/a&gt;. Let's look at some pictures.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/4633267894/" title="taye8gqo by wmconnolley, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3402/4633267894_996bef4122.jpg" width="500" height="400" alt="taye8gqo" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Probably the least interesting is this one &lt;a href="http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/index.html"&gt;from NSIDC&lt;/a&gt;. But it looks exciting, doesn't it. Woo-hoo, look, the sea ice now is lower than it was in 2007, that means it will be at minimum, too, doesn't it? Well no, of course not. Look at &lt;a href="http://www.iup.uni-bremen.de:8084/amsr/ice_ext_n.png"this one from AWI&lt;/a&gt;:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/4632684509/" title="f3tu67d1 by wmconnolley, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4051/4632684509_3c3df6657c.jpg" width="500" height="357" alt="f3tu67d1" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;2006 was well below 2007 at this point, and turned out to be uninteresting. As far as I know, no-one believes in predicting the minimum (which, of course, is the only number anyone gives a toss about) based on previous months. And when I say no-one cares about anything else that isn't really true; various people have started caring about the ice volume instead, but I'm a bit dubious about how exciting that is.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;But for no reason that I can strongly justify, I happen to prefer the &lt;a href="http://www.ijis.iarc.uaf.edu/en/home/seaice_extent.htm"&gt;IJIS AMSR pix&lt;/a&gt;, reproduced below:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/4632694789/" title="2m3wl6xy by wmconnolley, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4039/4632694789_1f6ba9110b.jpg" width="500" height="313" alt="2m3wl6xy" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Which is similar too, but clearly not identical too, the AWI pic. Which shows the obvious: that retrieval from space isn't exact.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Anyway, so what? So, it is not too late to join in the great predict-sea-ice-this-year party. My entry this year is "the same as" last year: linear trend since 1979, this time *not* omitting 2007 or 2008. As I recall, last year RMG was kind enough to work out what that came to in real numbers; perhaps he will again. As before, the possibility of a bet only really makes sense if people actually think very differently from me: which would be, either they think that there will be substantial ice growth this year, or some sudden collapse.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;So, there you go: usual money on offer, which is to say "unlimited", in the sense that so far no-one has wanted to take me close to my limit. If you manage to get there I'll let you know.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'd also be interested in the other betting pools that are presumably around this year.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;* &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2008/09/sea_ice_declaring_victory_and.php"&gt;Me declaring victory in 2008&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
* &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/01/sea_ice_again_1.php"&gt;Me wondering, in January, what we might bet on this year and various people making impractical suggestions :-)&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[A couple of updates: firstly, I should mention that &lt;a href="http://hot-topic.co.nz/"&gt;Gareth&lt;/a&gt; has been pushing the &lt;a href="http://psc.apl.washington.edu/ArcticSeaiceVolume/images/BPIOMASIceVolumeAnomalyCurrent.png"&gt;ice volume stuff&lt;/a&gt; and I admit that picture does look interesting. &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;and second, NB says "The ice is looking uncommonly mushy on MODIS" which I think I'd pay attention to, and look at myself, if I had the time. Maybe during tomorrows's batch of compilations.]&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/three-views-on-sea-ice.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/wp2qzxHOwnU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/wp2qzxHOwnU/three-views-on-sea-ice.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/three-views-on-sea-ice.php</guid>
         <category>climate betting</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 23 May 2010 16:35:21 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/three-views-on-sea-ice.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>"Offend Every Religion and Non-Religion Day"</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://backseatdriving.blogspot.com/2010/05/whether-to-join-offend-every-religion.html"&gt;Brian&lt;/a&gt; says it is &lt;a href="http://www.thecommentfactory.com/draw-muhammad-day-is-a-farce-2992/"&gt;draw Muhammad day&lt;/a&gt; so here is a nice pic I found:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/4626107543/" title="must-not-draw-mohammed-big by wmconnolley, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4065/4626107543_1139364fdc.jpg" width="500" height="375" alt="must-not-draw-mohammed-big" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;I'm afraid I don't know the original source - it looks to have been a Frog (this *is* offend everyone day, isn't it?) - oh hold, on, it is &lt;a href="http://www.plantu.net/"&gt;Plantu&lt;/a&gt;. I've delicately altered the original, I bet you can't tell where :-).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://theoatmeal.com/quiz/weasels" width="214" height="240" alt="weasels" align=right /&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3326/4626263227_773541d2eb_t.jpg" width="89" height="100" alt="weasels" align=right /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; Olde Atrichoke points me to "Jesus and Mo" which has a nice gentle one &lt;a href="http://www.jesusandmo.net/2010/05/14/web/"&gt;about excess internet usage&lt;/a&gt;, one for the climate-y folk about &lt;a href="http://www.jesusandmo.net/2010/05/18/yeah/"&gt;Denialists&lt;/a&gt;. And then there is &lt;a href="http://www.jesusandmo.net/2010/05/20/"&gt;Today's&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Predictably enough this offends &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/south_asia/10136576.stm"&gt;the wackos&lt;/a&gt; which I presume is the point - to try to tire them out. Also predictably enough, there is a wiki page on this: [[&lt;a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Everybody_Draw_Mohammed_Day"Everybody Draw Mohammed Day&lt;/a&gt;]].&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/offend_every_religion_and_non-.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/44nb7dko3qo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/44nb7dko3qo/offend_every_religion_and_non-.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/offend_every_religion_and_non-.php</guid>
         <category>misc</category>
         
         <pubDate>Fri, 21 May 2010 07:35:18 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/offend_every_religion_and_non-.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Cactus</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/4621534963/" title="DSC_4593 by wmconnolley, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3321/4621534963_9580e57063.jpg" width="500" height="334" alt="DSC_4593" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;About once a decade (no, I lie - the last was in &lt;a href="http://mustelid.blogspot.com/2005/06/cactus-flowers-and-swarms.html"&gt;2005&lt;/a&gt;), our cactus flowers. Here it is again, only this time it has excelled itself and produced four (yes I know you can only see two in this pic). I also rather like the way you can see the flower structure merging into the leaf. &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/sets/72157623970615847/"&gt;There are more pix&lt;/a&gt; if you like.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This is also a sentimental cactus: my grandparents used to own it, and more: it was a gift to them from my uncle Roland.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/cactus.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/_pwAYJzaM4w" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/_pwAYJzaM4w/cactus.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/cactus.php</guid>
         <category>misc</category>
         
         <pubDate>Wed, 19 May 2010 13:16:56 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/cactus.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Strangely High Temperatures</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://davidappell.blogspot.com/2010/05/strangely-high-temperatures.html"&gt;David Appell&lt;/a&gt; has a rather dramatic graph:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_7pPdnIdJ3DE/S_HeELlynPI/AAAAAAAAAdA/zCirCbQOizg/s1600/UAH-surface-051710.JPG"&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;It is from &lt;a href="http://discover.itsc.uah.edu/amsutemps/execute.csh?amsutemps"&gt;Roy Spencer&lt;/a&gt;. As DA says: I'm sure those skeptics who pored over every detail of the sea ice this winter will be touting this picture soon :-).&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Update: BCL points me to http://bigcitylib.blogspot.com/2009/07/pielke-sr-respnds.html which again suggests problems with UAH. Well, we all know we should use RSS anyway. Hopefully they will provide the funky interface &lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Update: &lt;a href="http://blogs.nature.com/climatefeedback/2010/05/picture_post_hottest_april_eve_1.html"&gt;Picture post: 'hottest April ever'&lt;/a&gt; says Nurture -W]&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/david_appell_has_a_rather.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/DOrJP0qIL7I" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/DOrJP0qIL7I/david_appell_has_a_rather.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/david_appell_has_a_rather.php</guid>
         <category>climate science</category>
         
         <pubDate>Tue, 18 May 2010 17:25:28 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/david_appell_has_a_rather.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Bee blogging</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/68718496/" title="Dscn1508-bee-pollen_crop_w800 by wmconnolley, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm1.static.flickr.com/6/68718496_105cb3d395.jpg" width="375" height="500" alt="Dscn1508-bee-pollen_crop_w800" align=right /&gt;&lt;/a&gt; (for Maz). Perceptive readers will notice that this is a bumblebee, and on a hollyhock, so is anachronistic.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Sunday afternoon, and I finally had time to see to the girls. This was my first visit of the year (oh, the shame) and so finding the beesuit and trousers and gloves was step one. Step two was the smoker, cardboard and matches. Step 3 took rather longer, and was to clear the nettles and general vegetation away from the hive. After that, it was time to open up, and I was pleased to find a happy hive full of bees with the two supers nearly full, but not capped. The Rape is around this year (last year, for a pleasant change, it wasn't) so I'll have to Take Off fairly soon. At this rate I may have to add another super first, which will mean digging out some frames or making them up.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Dredging down in the brood box (they were being well behaved) I found a couple of empty queen cells, which tallies with a neighbour a few doors off who had a swarm of bees descend on his house on Saturday and then vanish inside his chimney (yes I went for a look, but since his roof is tall and his fireplace bricked up, there was little to do). Although the hive felt somewhat full for that. Ah well, who knows really. I'm happy they survived the winter - Nikola's didn't.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/bee_blogging_1.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/S0QsVaUmpf0" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/S0QsVaUmpf0/bee_blogging_1.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/bee_blogging_1.php</guid>
         <category>bees</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 16:49:19 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/bee_blogging_1.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>surfacetemperatures.org</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.surfacetemperatures.org/"&gt;surfacetemperatures.org/&lt;/a&gt; is a bit odd - perhaps rather rushed. &lt;i&gt;Braod aspects to be covered will be...&lt;/i&gt; suggests that they haven't even had time to spell check it. That they don't mention &lt;a href="http://clearclimatecode.org/"&gt;clearclimatecode.org/&lt;/a&gt; makes me think this is going to be officious ponderous we-need-our-own-wheel stuff. Still, who knows? There is &lt;a href="http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v465/n7295/pdf/465158a.pdf"&gt;stuff in Nature too&lt;/a&gt;. Is this really just the reaction to the CRU email junk that it looks like? If so, it is pointless.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Update: &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/surfacetemperaturesorg.php#comment-2527814"&gt;Peter Thorne comments&lt;/a&gt;, and you should be sure to read that -W]&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/surfacetemperaturesorg.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/pTidNDUPMVM" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/pTidNDUPMVM/surfacetemperaturesorg.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/surfacetemperaturesorg.php</guid>
         <category>climate communication</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 16 May 2010 17:06:33 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/surfacetemperaturesorg.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Innsbruck / Stubai</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;In 2001 I had the chance to visit the Stubai for a couple of days at the start and in the middle of a conference in Innsbruck. It was wonderful, and I didn't kill myself. I've finally uploaded the pix; see &lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/sets/72157623937186057/"&gt;flickr&lt;/a&gt; if you're interested.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/4606978573/" title="Dscn3302-me by wmconnolley, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4068/4606978573_8d50a943a4.jpg" width="500" height="375" alt="Dscn3302-me" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;The mountains are great for either solo'ing, or an easy introduction. And the huts are splendid too. And not all the people look as silly as that, though a beret is remarkably practical.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Miriam and Miranda forced me to shave the beard off, eventually.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/innsbruck_stubai.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/1_eG6u7E2wU" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/1_eG6u7E2wU/innsbruck_stubai.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/innsbruck_stubai.php</guid>
         <category />
         
         <pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 18:14:09 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/innsbruck_stubai.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Broon oot</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;A href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8675913.stm"&gt;Broon has gone&lt;/a&gt;, for good this time, unlike yesterday's fake resignation. He appears to have achieved one thing: yesterday's last-gasp offer to the LD appears to have forced the Tories to offer a referendum on &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8644480.stm"&gt;AV&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;However, it wasn't enough to tempt the LD's to him, and his own party was iffy, and it wouldn't have been a majority. So today he said "bugger this for a game of soldiers" and pissed off. Only he wrapped it up in a &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/election_2010/8676273.stm"&gt;dignified speech&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;My own keyinsight (hexapodia!) is so-far unarticulated by anyone else, and is hidden over the fold.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/broon_oot.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/broon_oot.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/CqpgQUqJ1qo" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/CqpgQUqJ1qo/broon_oot.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/broon_oot.php</guid>
         <category>politics</category>
         
         <pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 14:44:06 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/broon_oot.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>COMMENT ON "FALSIFICATION OF THE ATMOSPHERIC CO2 GREENHOUSE EFFECTS WITHIN THE FRAME OF PHYSICS"</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;Sorry about the CAPS, maybe physics folk are all RATHER SHOUTY. Never mind:&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;blockquote&gt;Abstract: In this journal, Gerhard Gerlich and Ralf D. Tscheuschner claim to have falsified the existence of an atmospheric greenhouse effect. Here, we show that their methods, logic, and conclusions are in error&lt;/blockquote&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.worldscinet.com/ijmpb/24/2410/S021797921005555X.html"&gt;Halpern et al., International Journal of Modern Physics B, Volume: 24, Issue: 10(2010) pp. 1309-1332 DOI: 10.1142/S021797921005555X&lt;/a&gt;. I'm pretty sure that has been blogged elsewhere, but call me Mr Sleepy. Anyway, a useful ref for those interested, and congrats to all involved for their patience with fools.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Update: some of the authors are starting up a new forum: &lt;a href="http://climatephysicsforums.com"&gt;climatephysicsforums.com&lt;/a&gt;]&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;[Update: &lt;i&gt;Let us start with Halpern's favorite object of lust&lt;/i&gt; - w00t! Do they mean a carrot? -W]&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/comment_on_falsification_of_th.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/9tcLH_mIk-U" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/9tcLH_mIk-U/comment_on_falsification_of_th.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/comment_on_falsification_of_th.php</guid>
         <category>climate science</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 17:47:53 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/comment_on_falsification_of_th.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality (and the head to head)</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;There is some more &lt;a href="http://www.fanfiction.net/s/5782108/11/Harry_Potter_and_the_Methods_of_Rationality"&gt;Harry Potter and the Methods of Rationality&lt;/a&gt; up - go get it now (ht: &lt;a href="http://pw201.livejournal.com/133847.html"&gt;Paul&lt;/a&gt;).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/harry_potter_and_the_methods_o.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/harry_potter_and_the_methods_o.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/SzhEqt5qHIw" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/SzhEqt5qHIw/harry_potter_and_the_methods_o.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/harry_potter_and_the_methods_o.php</guid>
         <category>politics</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sat, 08 May 2010 15:53:15 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/harry_potter_and_the_methods_o.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>We win!</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;Yes, the &lt;a href="http://www.greenparty.org.uk/"&gt;Green&lt;/a&gt;s have got their &lt;a href="http://www.greenparty.org.uk/news/2010-05-07-caroline-wins.html"&gt;first UK parliamentary seat&lt;/a&gt; [&lt;a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/politics/article7119179.ece#cid=OTC-RSS&amp;attr=797084"&gt;1&lt;/a&gt;]. Congratulations to Caroline Lucas in Brighton. And with the current hung parliament, it might even do some good. I wonder how well the GP would stand up to real politics?&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;More later when the results come in.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Oh yes: as a token gesture towards the real world: shame abuot the Lib Dems. Which caused me to look up &lt;a href="http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/shared/election2010/results/constituency/e09.stm"&gt;South Cambs&lt;/a&gt;. This is usually a shoo-in for Lansley. And it was this time too, except that the Lib Dems were very clearly second and Labour nowhere. Maybe some hope for next time.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/we_win_1.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/we_win_1.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/1smGY2Dqkzk" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/1smGY2Dqkzk/we_win_1.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/we_win_1.php</guid>
         <category>politics</category>
         
         <pubDate>Fri, 07 May 2010 03:34:58 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/we_win_1.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Where's Loki?</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;img src="http://wheresloki.com/sites/default/files/CIMG1608.JPG" align=right width=200 height=200&gt;Dr Southgate has lost his cat. Please see &lt;a href="http://www.wheresloki.com/"&gt;http://www.wheresloki.com/&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;This post is most likely to be of interest to Cambridge residents. Please don't prove me wrong :-).&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/wheres_loki.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/Dl3GpTs_kWs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/Dl3GpTs_kWs/wheres_loki.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/wheres_loki.php</guid>
         <category>misc</category>
         
         <pubDate>Mon, 03 May 2010 16:54:32 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/wheres_loki.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
      <item>
         <title>Wallingford</title>
          <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.flickr.com/photos/belette/4572611630/" title="DSC_4558-boathouse_crop by wmconnolley, on Flickr"&gt;&lt;img src="http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4021/4572611630_c37c69f135.jpg" width="500" height="122" alt="DSC_4558-boathouse_crop" /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Yes, another boatie post. I promise you a short break for at least a few days after this one. Unlike &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/head_o_the_cam.php"&gt;our little event on the Cam&lt;/a&gt;, &lt;a href="http://www.wallingford.regatta.org.uk/index.html"&gt;Wallingford&lt;/a&gt; is The Big Time, and to celebrate the regatta is... yes, you guessed: nowhere near Wallingford at all. That confused me no end. It is in fact on Eton (old sausage) rowing lake (Dorney), a massive trench in the ground designed, as far as I can see, primarily to demonstrate that Eton has (or perhaps had, before they did this) stupendous quantities of spare cash. Though to be fair they did a decent cup of coffee and flapjack at a fair price.&lt;/p&gt; &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/wallingford.php"&gt;Read the rest of this post...&lt;/a&gt; | &lt;a href="http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/wallingford.php#commentsArea"&gt;Read the comments on this post...&lt;/a&gt;&lt;img src="http://feeds.feedburner.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~4/q_8oXJEwOhs" height="1" width="1"/&gt;</description>
         <link>http://feedproxy.google.com/~r/scienceblogs/stoat/~3/q_8oXJEwOhs/wallingford.php</link>
         <guid isPermaLink="false">http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/wallingford.php</guid>
         <category>rowing</category>
         
         <pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 17:27:51 -0500</pubDate>
      <feedburner:origLink>http://scienceblogs.com/stoat/2010/05/wallingford.php</feedburner:origLink></item>
      
   </channel>
</rss>