Now on ScienceBlogs: Basics: Guest Post 1: Male Reproductive Anatomy

Dispatches from the Culture Wars

Thoughts From the Interface of Science, Religion, Law and Culture

Profile

brayton_headshot_wre_1443.jpg Ed Brayton is a journalist, commentator and speaker. He is the co-founder and president of Michigan Citizens for Science and co-founder of The Panda's Thumb. He has written for such publications as The Bard, Skeptic and Reports of the National Center for Science Education, spoken in front of many organizations and conferences, and appeared on nationally syndicated radio shows and on C-SPAN. Ed is also a Fellow with the Center for Independent Media and the host of Declaring Independence, a one hour weekly political talk show on WPRR in Grand Rapids, Michigan.(static)

Search

Recent Comments

Recent Posts

Blogroll


Science Blogs Legal Blogs Political Blogs Random Smart and Interesting People Evolution Resources

Archives

Other Information

Ed Brayton also blogs at Positive Liberty and The Panda's Thumb



Ed Brayton is a participant in the Center for Independent Media New Journalism Program. However, all of the statements, opinions, policies, and views expressed on this site are solely Ed Brayton's. This web site is not a production of the Center, and the Center does not support or endorse any of the contents on this site.

Ed's Audio and Video

Declaring Independence podcast feed

YearlyKos 2007

Video of speech on Dover and the Future of the Anti-Evolution Movement

Audio of Greg Raymer Interview

E-mail Policy

Any and all emails that I receive may be reprinted, in part or in full, on this blog with attribution. If this is not acceptable to you, do not send me e-mail - especially if you're going to end up being embarrassed when it's printed publicly for all to see.

Read the Bills Act Coalition

My Ecosystem Details



My Amazon.com Wish List

« Rachel Maddow Show Tonight | Main | Worldnutdaily: Obama Will Steal Next Election! »

Dumbass Quote of the Day

Posted on: March 5, 2010 9:02 AM, by Ed Brayton

From Rush Limbaugh:

Mullah Nancy bin Pelosi. She's no different than these mullahs and these imams who convince all these people to put bombs on their kids and send them out there to blow up.

And then he launches into a completely irrelevant rant about Charlie Rangel -- about whom he is right. Rangel should be nailed hard by the ethics committee and he won't be and all that talk of this being the most ethical Congress in history is utter bullshit. But what on Earth does that have to do with this idiotic statement above?

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

Comments

1

Since when should we expected a consistent and logical argument from him (or others in his company)?

Posted by: senor | March 5, 2010 9:29 AM

2

Rushbo demonization of anyone or anything requires nothing more than the crap to fall from his lips. Dittoheads eat it like candy.

Posted by: MikeMa | March 5, 2010 9:34 AM

3

The right-wing echo chamber has adopted a simple and effective tactic: repeat the sound bite as often as possible. "Tax-and-spend", "weak on defense", "terrorist-loving", "ivory-tower elites". They have so many now you need a scorecard. You could play "right-wing talking point bingo". Sometimes you can tell that they don't even care what phrases they use to string the sound bites together. Relevance is irrelevant.

Posted by: Taz | March 5, 2010 9:42 AM

4

I think Nancy is like the mothers of suicide bombers because she said that representatives should vote on the health reform bill without thinking of whether they would be re-elected or not; i.e., she was encouraging Dems to be suicidal in their votes. Or something. Also.

Posted by: BC | March 5, 2010 10:47 AM

5
But what on Earth does that have to do with this idiotic statement above?

In a rightwing mind, it does make sense. See, Limbaugh, like every single other rightwingnut, considers the Universe to be revolving around his own person. Thus, the relevancy of events depends solely on how much they affect Limbaugh himself - and by that logic, Pelosi saying something he disagrees with it just as bad, if not worse, than causing the death of a couple of dozen brown-skinned heathens in some far-away country he's never been to because they don't have cheap hookers.

Posted by: Phillip IV | March 5, 2010 12:03 PM

6

You're probably right about the current congress, but most ethical congress in history is a pretty low bar.

Posted by: penn | March 5, 2010 12:18 PM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
Enter to win the daily giveaway
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.