Now on ScienceBlogs: Weather Explains Politics

recapred.png

Neuron Culture

David Dobbs on science, nature, and culture.

Search

Profile

dobbspic I write on science, medicine, nature, culture and other matters for the New York Times Magazine, The Atlantic, Slate, National Geographic, Scientific American Mind, and other publications. (Find clips here.) Right now I'm writing my fourth book, The Orchid and the Dandelion, which explores the hypothesis that the genetic roots some of our worst problems and traits — depresison, hyperaggression, violence, antisocial behavior — can also give rise to resilience, cooperation, empathy, and contentment. The book expands on my December 2009 Atlantic article exploring these ideas. I've also written three books, including Reef Madness: Charles Darwin, Alexander Agassiz, and the Meaning of Coral, which traces the strangest but most forgotten controversy in Darwin's career — an elemental dispute running some 75 years.

If you'd like, you can subscribe to Neuron Culture by email. You might also want to see more of my work at my main website or check out my Tumblr log.



My Google Shared links

Recent Posts

Recent Comments

Categories

« The importance of stupidity in scientific research (and in writing), by Randy Burgess | Main | "No pity party, no macho man." Psychologist Dave Grossman on surviving killing »

Still hope for writers everywhere: Robots take over sports desk - but need writer to write lede.

Posted on: November 5, 2009 6:20 AM, by David Dobbs

By way of demonstration, the group plugged in stats from the Oct. 11 playoff game between the Angels and the Red Sox:

BOSTON -- Things looked bleak for the Angels when they trailed by two runs in the ninth inning, but Los Angeles recovered thanks to a key single from Vladimir Guerrero to pull out a 7-6 victory over the Boston Red Sox at Fenway Park on Sunday.

Guerrero drove in two Angels runners. He went 2-4 at the plate.

Posted via web from David Dobbs's Somatic Marker

Share this: Stumbleupon Reddit Email + More

TrackBacks

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://scienceblogs.com/mt/pings/124076

Comments

1

Sports are pretty robotic anyway, aren't they? Same games, same rules, same behaviors, same press coverage, pretty much the same teams in the same contests year after year, with few real surprises....

Posted by: IanW | November 5, 2009 7:21 AM

2

Ian, with all due respect, methinks you're not paying enough attention. Though I must confess, only a couple sports really engage me. Usu more meaningful if you also play. In right cases -- for me, mainly baseball and tennis, which I have played a lot and (baseball) still play — the play holds dynamics as rich as those of music.

Posted by: David Dobbs | November 5, 2009 10:29 AM

Post a Comment

(Email is required for authentication purposes only. On some blogs, comments are moderated for spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.)





ScienceBlogs

Search ScienceBlogs:

Go to:

Advertisement
Collective Imagination
benchfly
Advertisement
Collective Imagination

© 2006-2009 ScienceBlogs LLC. ScienceBlogs is a registered trademark of ScienceBlogs LLC. All rights reserved.